Category Archives: Syndicated

Crooked Marquee – Generation Wealth: Movies About Conspicuous Consumption

The folks over at Crooked Marquee have given us a great analysis of a variety of movies about extreme wealth and privilege and how it poisons. I’ve included a sample from their post as they discuss the documentary Queen of Versailles by Lauren Greenfield. 

As the chasm grows between those who can’t afford to visit the dentist and those who spend a year’s worth of Ivy League tuition on a handbag, it is pertinent to re-examine films about the wealth and greed…

Nearly 10 years ago, Greenfield examined the Siegel family, the multimillionaire owners of the Westgate resorts, in her documentary Queen of Versailles. Greenfield unfolds their almost carnivalesque pursuit of the most ostentatious lifestyle possible. Their myopic, moneyed view of the world is absurd, such as when Jackie Siegel complains that her 10-person family is “bursting out of the seams” in their current mega-mansion. To assuage these devastating spacial issues, Jackie aims to construct one of the largest and most expensive single-family “houses” in the United States. At 90,000 square feet, it is more like a real-life Richie Rich palace, complete with 30 bathrooms, 10 kitchens, a bowling alley, ice-skating rink, and even a baseball field.

But the Great Recession of 2008 comes catapulting into the Siegel’s dreams like a giant wrecking ball, turning their life into what David Siegel sardonically dubs a “riches to rags story.” Struggling to cope with their reduced income, the Siegels are forced to sell their lofty castle for a mere $100 million. Some of their downfall is played for laughs, like when Jackie rents a car and asks who her driver will be, but for the most part Greenfield admonishes and pities her subjects. When they must let a few of their multiple nannies and housekeepers go, their home becomes a grubby, horrifying pigsty where pets are left to die and dog shit piles on the floor. Perhaps having a four-bedroom house would be a lot more manageable for the Siegels.

One of the most wretched moments in Queen of Versailles is when Jackie, in an attempt to save money, purchases Christmas presents at Wal-Mart. She grabs as many toys as she can without even looking, putting zero thought or heart into the gifts she is giving her children. When she returns home, one of the nannies puts a newly minted bike in the garage where it sits among at least 20 untouched others of the exact same kind. Toward the end of the documentary, Greenfield asks Mr. Siegel, who is sitting on a colossal and outlandish gold throne, what his hopes for the future are. “A plane. A yacht,” he stoutly replies. He does not wish for anything having to do with his family or any kind of human experience — he just has an insipid desire for more things. But it is never enough. One of Jackie Siegel’s former neighbors attests that “the American Dream is rising way up above what you started with.” But how much is too far? There is a stark line between living a life improved and one of bloated, fanatical avarice. Queen of Versailles shakes its head in horrified and bemused disbelief at the Siegels’ profuse spending habits and strikes a deft balance between mocking and sympathizing with them…

These films hammer home similar messages about how true happiness is interpersonal and not monetary. Yet filmmakers continue to return to this theme again and again, suggesting that society’s desire for wealth is an innate part of human nature that we will never shake off. And as Laura Greenfield says in Generation Wealth, it seems to be even worse in this Kardashian, #richkidsofinstagram age. “Greed is good” Gordon Gecko once snarled in Wall Street, but these films prove that greed is also hideous, sad, thrilling, and utterly intoxicating.

Generation Wealth: Movies About Conspicuous Consumption

Looking Closer – The Theology of the Coen Brothers

Jeffery Overstreet and Matt Zoller Seitz are two of my favorite authors / movie critics. I value their opinions and their beliefs. So I was very excited to see that they sat down to discuss my favorite living directors (Joel and Ethan Coen) and talked about their view of God. You can read the full discussion over at Overstreet’s blog “Looking Closer.” 

Religion, while it binds communities and brings meaning through ritual, is ultimately not enough. I’m not willing to brand the Coens as “covert Christians.” And even if I did, the word “Christian” is about as meaningful anymore as the word “conservative” or “Democrat”, or the term “the American way.” It means a million things to a million people. But they are definitely drawn to a vision of the cosmos that resonates with my understanding of Christ’s teachings. That is to say that “righteousness,” the ways of religion, and the law-focused method of an “Old Testament” worldview, are ultimately insufficient.

We cannot earn our way to heaven by being good. We cannot save ourselves. The Coens know that “all have sinned,” and they know that “the wages of sin is death.” Everybody is likely to die miserably in their movies, whether as a result of their own evil or someone else’s.

But there is something out there, some kind of offer of grace, and when we glimpse that, goodness happens in us. We begin to love not for selfish reasons, but as a response, as a reflection, as if we are instruments being tuned up by something greater than ourselves.

No, I think that the clearest summation of their worldview comes from Mattie in their True Grit remake: “You must pay for everything in this world, one way and another. There is nothing free except the grace of God.”

If you enjoyed that snippet, I hope you’ll read the full discussion. And if that isn’t enough there is a whole book written on the topic of the Coens’ theology. The Dude Abides: The Gospel According to the Coen Brothers by Cathleen Falsani

Looking Closer – Are Bob, Helen, Dash, Violet, and Jack-Jack still Incredible?

Jeffrey Overstreet hits the nail on the head in his assessment of the latest from one of my all-time favorite action directors, Brad Bird. Incredibles 2 has made its box office splash and it was an enjoyable film but there was something that was nagging at me during the final act. When I read his review, he unveiled that sense of uneasiness. 

The Screenslaver’s convictions about what happens when citizens give up their agency, failing to use their democratic powers against evil, and sit around waiting for “heroes” to save the day, remain relevant to the story and worth discussing after the movie. It’s not a con, meant to distract us from the villain’s real concern. It’s just that the villain’s big secret is predictable and anticlimactic, and that speech — with its persuasively valid concerns — gets swamped by third-act action and mayhem. At the end, I’m struggling to reconstruct what the movie’s really all about.

Are Bob, Helen, Dash, Violet, and Jack-Jack still Incredible?

Crooked Marquee – Halftime Report: 2018 in Movies (So Far)

I thought that I liked statistics, but the folks over at Crooked Marquee have put me to shame. They have taken a dive into a breakdown of the roughly 615 movies released in the first half of 2018. They divided the movies into three groups: wide releases (70), limited releases (443), and documentaries (102). 

They’re not looking for the best film, but are looking at who is making these films and where are they coming from both culturally and intellectually. One of the best stats that I saw was about where ideas for mainstream feature films comes from. It’s worth a click!

Halftime Report: 2018 in Movies (So Far)

Christ and Pop Culture – First Reformed and the Theology of the Cross

David McNutt over at Christ and Pop Culture shares a satisfying exposition of my favorite movie of the year so far, First Reformed. It is contemplative and spiritual. Don’t expect entertainment. This is like eating your cinematic vegetables. 

A Cinematic Theology of the Cross: Despair and Hope in Paul Schrader’s First Reformed

The Dreamers of La La Land • Senses of Cinema

How do you make a happy movie in America without being jumped on? Either America has forgotten how to make uplifting films so deeply that a work like La La Land is, despite its uplifting façade, only a symptom of this malaise, or we have forgotten how to critically appraise such films without competing for the deepest and hardest cuts. Or maybe both.

Source: The Dreamers of La La Land • Senses of Cinema