Rope (1948)

20110403-102615.jpgAre there a special few individuals to whom the laws don’t apply, perhaps because they are educated at the finest schools or because they come from families with money or influence? What makes murder such a horrifying sin? Why don’t we cringe at other sins? Are there some sins that make the sinner feel superior? These are some of the questions that Rope concerns itself with. Not that it is a movie about these things, but as I watched it, my mind went to these questions. Rope is simply an adaptation of the true story of the Leopold-Loeb murder that took place in Chicago in 1924. In said murder, two wealthy and intelligent young men, Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, killed Loeb’s 14-year-old second cousin Robert Franks for no other reason than the thrill of the kill.

In Rope our murderers are two similarly wealthy and presumably intelligent young men named Brandon and Phillip. However, instead of dispatching of a 14-year-old boy in the back seat of a rented car, they strangle a peer named David in their shared apartment and stow his body in a large trunk. The signature Hitchcockian twist comes when instead of disposing of the body in a more traditional manner, these well-to-do young men host a cocktail party and use the makeshift coffin as a dinner table, and the guests of honor are the boy’s father, aunt, and fiancé. It seems like the perfect murder, but an admired professor named Rupert Cadell (James Stewart) begins to sense that something is disturbing about this party and their master plan begins to unravel.

20110403-102233.jpgMy father had amassed a nice library of Hitchcock films by the time that I was old enough to start watching them. My first venture into the world and mind of Alfred Hitchcock, and my enduring favorite of his collection was North By Northwest. But I recall watching this nearly forgotten gem after Birds had scared the pants off of me and I was thoroughly hooked on the style, humor, and suspense of the master.

I believe that I was around 12 or 13 when I first watched Rope. It was on one of the lonely afternoons I spent alone after school waiting for my parents to arrive home. It may have been a forbidden activity, that might have originally drawn me to the cabinet filled to the brim with VHS gold. But it was the quality of the selections that drew me deeper in. 20110403-102217.jpgI am so very thankful that my parents didn’t care for most of the pabulum that was churned out during the late 70s and 80s. Instead they possessed a library of classics and future classics. Forget Airplane or Karate Kid, I would get to those later, I had Young Frankenstein and Indiana Jones to keep me company.

I’m not sure why Rope caught my eye with its unassuming title, mixed reviews, no guffawing humor, bodily functions, explosions, or nudity. In fact it fails to catch the attention of the adults it was created for, but in spite of all of that, it remains one of my top 5 all time favorite Hitchcock films, even though Hitchcock himself called it a failed experiment. You can actually watch a large portion of the film in a wonderful 3 part documentary on the making of the film called “Rope Unleashed.”

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYufeSJXeIU]

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOLCtLAyXEk]

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bNvCsmPZqA]

Facebook Comments

4 thoughts on “Rope (1948)”

  1. Lucky you discovering Hitchcock movies so early on. I’ve been catching up with the in the last couple of years (still got lots to see). Rope was an interesting experiment and amazing such long shots were used and the planning it took to move everything around while shooting in order to allow the camera to make it’s moves. Must have been a lot of pressure on the set crew and the actors as well, as one mistake could ruin a whole shot. Great review!

    1. I still haven’t seen them all, but all I’m really lacking are some of his earlier films. The technique of this film is really amazing. I’m not sure if it’s true or not, but they say that during the shooting, a crew member moving the walls broke his foot and another person swooped in and gagged him and dragged him away so he wouldn’t ruin the shot. I can only imagine the type and quality of films that Hitchcock would be making if he were alive today with all our technological advances.

  2. Lucky you discovering Hitchcock movies so early on. I’ve been catching up with the in the last couple of years (still got lots to see). Rope was an interesting experiment and amazing such long shots were used and the planning it took to move everything around while shooting in order to allow the camera to make it’s moves. Must have been a lot of pressure on the set crew and the actors as well, as one mistake could ruin a whole shot. Great review!

    1. I still haven’t seen them all, but all I’m really lacking are some of his earlier films. The technique of this film is really amazing. I’m not sure if it’s true or not, but they say that during the shooting, a crew member moving the walls broke his foot and another person swooped in and gagged him and dragged him away so he wouldn’t ruin the shot. I can only imagine the type and quality of films that Hitchcock would be making if he were alive today with all our technological advances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *